benchmark-due-diligence

Adversarial due-diligence on a benchmark you envy (a founder, KOL, company, or product whose claimed success you suspect is inflated). Inline four-phase orchestration: fan-out collection, adversarial verification grading every claim L1-L4 to separate marketing bubble from real signal, attribution weighting (product vs timing vs personal-IP vs luck, and which parts are replicable), then mapping the validated playbook onto the commissioner's own resources with concrete next moves. Use whenever the user wants to 尽调/对标/拆解 a competitor or role-model, suspects 水分/泡沫 in someone's claims (Product Hunt #1, 0-to-1M-users, funding rounds), asks what they can actually steal from a benchmark, or wants to know if a benchmark's wins are real and copyable before betting on the same strategy. Prefer over deep-research when the goal is debunking inflated claims and extracting a replicable playbook, not a neutral briefing.